* = student author<\/p>\n
*Cranford, E. A., & Moss, J. (in press). Generating predictive inferences when multiple alternatives are available. Discourse Processes<\/i>. OSF project site<\/a><\/p>\n *Cranford, E. A., & Moss, J. (2018). Mouse-tracking evidence for parallel anticipatory option evaluation. Cognitive processing<\/i>, 19<\/i>(3), 327-350. OSF project site<\/a><\/p>\n Eakin, D., & Moss, J. (in press). The methodology of metamemory and metacomprehension. In Otani, H. & Schwartz, B. Handbook of Research Methods in Human Memory<\/em>. Routledge.<\/p>\n *Goucher-Lambert, K., Moss, J., & Cagan, J. (in press). A neuroimaging investigation of design ideation with and without inspirational stimuli\u2014understanding the meaning of near and far stimuli. Design Studies<\/i>.<\/p>\n *Goucher-Lambert, K., Moss J., Cagan J. (2018). Unsuccessful external search: Using neuroimaging to understand fruitless periods of design ideation involving inspirational stimuli. 2018 Design Computing & Cognition Conference.<\/p>\n *Jones, W. E., Moss, J. (in press). Assessing the Transfer of Interruption Resumption Skill to Novel Tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied.<\/em> OSF project site<\/a><\/p>\n *Goucher-Lambert K., Moss J., Cagan J. (2017). Inside the mind: Using neuroimaging to understand moral product preference judgments involving sustainability. Journal of Mechanical Design<\/em>. PDF<\/a><\/p>\n *Goucher-Lambert, K., Moss J,, Cagan J. (2017). A meta-analytic approach for uncovering neural activation patterns of sustainable product preference decisions. In J. Gero (Ed.), Design Computing and Cognition ’16 (pp. 173-191). Springer. PDF<\/a><\/p>\n *Wong A.Y., Moss J., Schunn C.D. (2016). Tracking reading strategy utilization through pupillometry. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. <\/em>PDF<\/a><\/p>\n *Goucher-Lambert K., Moss J., Cagan J. (2016). Using neuroimaging to understand product preference judgments involving sustainability. Proceedings of the 2016 ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference. <\/em>New York: ASME. PDF<\/a><\/p>\n Moss, J., Schunn, C. D., (2015). Comprehension through explanation as the interaction of the brain\u2019s coherence and cognitive control networks. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9<\/em>(562). <\/em>PDF<\/a><\/p>\n *Jones, W. E., Moss, J. (2015). Interruption-recovery training transfers to novel tasks. Proceedings of the Thirty-seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society <\/em>(pp. 1027-1032), Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.\u00a0PDF<\/a><\/p>\n Moss, J. (2015). Introduction to AIMS Neuroscience Special Issue \u201cWhat Function Does the Anterior Insula Play in Human Cognition?\u201d AIMS Neuroscience<\/em>, 2<\/em>(3), 153\u2013154.\u00a0PDF<\/a><\/p>\n *Bai, H., *Jones, W. E., Moss, J., & Doane, S. M. (2014). Relating individual differences in cognitive ability to multitasking performance: Interruption recovery and task difficulty.\u00a0Learning and Individual Differences<\/em>. PDF<\/a><\/p>\n Moss, R. A., Moss, J. (2014).\u00a0The Role of Dynamic Columns in Explaining Gamma-band Synchronization and NMDA Receptors in Cognitive Functions.\u00a0AIMS Neuroscience, 1<\/em>(1), 65-88. PDF<\/a><\/p>\n Moss, R. A. & Moss, J. (2014). Commentary on the Pinotsis and Friston Neural Fields DCM and the Cadonic and Albensi Oscillations and NMDA Receptors Articles. AIMS Neuroscience, 1<\/em>(2), 158-162.\u00a0PDF<\/a><\/p>\n Moss, J., Schunn, C. D., Schneider, W., & McNamara, D. S. (2013). The nature of mind wandering during reading varies with the cognitive control demands of the reading strategy.\u00a0Brain Research, 1539<\/em>, 48-60.\u00a0<\/em>PDF<\/a><\/p>\n Gregory, A., Herrmann, M. M., Miller, B., & Moss, J. (2013). Integrated practice and architecture education: The evolution of a pedagogy. Proceedings of the 2013 ARCC Spring Research Conference (pp. 310-320).Charlotte, NC: University of North Carolina at Charlotte. PDF<\/a><\/p>\n Gregory, A., Herrmann, M. M., Miller, B., & Moss, J. (2013). Inter-actions: The making of an integrated practice studio.The National Conference on the Beginning Design Student 2013.Philadelphia, PA. PDF<\/a><\/p>\n Herrmann, M. M., Gregory, A. D., Miller, B., & Moss, J. (2013). An industry-sponsored competition to exploreintegrated project Delivery in an educational setting. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Associated Schools of Construction. Fort Collins, CO: Associated Schools of Construction. PDF<\/a><\/p>\n *Cranford, E. A., Moss, J. (2012). Is insight always the same? A protocol analysis of insight in compound remote associate problems. The Journal of Problem Solving, 4(1), Article 7. PDF<\/a><\/p>\n *Cranford, E. A., Moss, J. (2011). Is insight always the same? An fMRI study of insight. Proceedings of the Thirty-third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. PDF<\/a><\/p>\n Moss, J., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2011). The effect of incidental hints when problems are suspended before, during, or after an impasse. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37<\/em>(1), 140-148. PDF<\/a><\/p>\n Moss, J., Schunn, C. D., Schneider, W., McNamara, D. S., & VanLehn, K. (2011). The neural correlates of strategic reading comprehension: Cognitive control and discourse comprehension. NeuroImage, 58<\/em>(2), 675-686. doi:10.1016\/j.neuroimage.2011.06.034<\/a> PDF<\/a><\/p>\n Moss, J., Schunn, C. D., Schneider, W., McNamara, D. S. (2011). An fMRI study of zoning out during strategic reading comprehension. Proceedings of the Thirty-third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. PDF<\/a><\/p>\n Moss, J., Schunn, C., Schnider, W., McNamara, D., VanLehn, K. (2010). An fMRI Study of Strategic Reading Comprehension. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Portland, OR. PDF<\/a><\/p>\n *Cranford, E., Moss, J. (2010). Investigating Insight Using Compound Remote Associate Programs. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Portland, OR. PDF<\/a><\/p>\n *Tseng, I., Moss, J., Cagan, J., & Kotovsky, K. (2008). Overcoming blocks in conceptual design: The effects of open goals and analogical similarity on idea generation. Proceedings of the 2008 ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference. New York: ASME. PDF<\/a><\/p>\n *Tseng, I., Moss, J., Cagan, J., & Kotovsky, K. (2008). The role of timing and analogical similarity in the stimulation of idea generation in design, Design Studies, 203-221. PDF<\/a><\/p>\n Moss, J., Cagan, J., & Kotovsky, K. (2007). Design ideas and impasses: The role of open goals. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design. PDF<\/a><\/p>\n Moss, J., Cagan, J., & Kotovsky, K. (2007). Understanding the role of open goals in problem solving: Impasses and hints. Proceedings of the Twenty-ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 1817), Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. PDF<\/a><\/p>\n Moss, J., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2007). The influence of open goals on the acquisition of problem relevant information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(5), 876-891. PDF<\/a><\/p>\n Moss, J. (2006). The role of open goals in acquiring problem relevant information. Doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. PDF<\/a><\/p>\n Moss, J., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2006). The role of functionality in the mental representations of engineering students: Some differences in the early stages of expertise. Cognitive Science, 30(1), 65-93. PDF<\/a><\/p>\n Moss, J., Cagan, J., & Kotovsky, K. (2004). Learning from design experience in an agent-based design system. Research in Engineering Design, 15(2), 77-92. PDF<\/a><\/p>\n Moss, J., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2004). Cognitive investigations into knowledge representation in engineering design. In J. Gero (Ed.), Design Computing and Cognition 2004 (pp. 97-116). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer. PDF<\/a><\/p>\n Moss, J., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2003). Knowledge representation in engineering design: An initial investigation. In R. Alterman and D. Kirsch (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 1386), Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. PDF<\/a><\/p>\n Moss, J., Cagan, J., & Kotovsky, K. (2002). Learning from design experience in an agent-based design System. In J. Gero and F. Brazier (Eds.), Agents in Design 2002 (pp. 181-200). Sydney, Australia: Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney. PDF<\/a> Moss, J., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2002). Cognitive principles in a computational engineering design methodology. In W. Gray and C. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 1023), Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. PDF<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" * = student author 2018\/in press *Cranford, E. A., & Moss, J. (in press). Generating predictive inferences when multiple alternatives are available. Discourse Processes. OSF project site *Cranford, E. A., & Moss, J. (2018). Mouse-tracking evidence for parallel anticipatory option evaluation. Cognitive processing, 19(3), 327-350. OSF project site Eakin, D., \u2026 Continue reading 2017<\/h2>\n
2016<\/h2>\n
2015<\/h2>\n
2014<\/h2>\n
2013<\/h2>\n
2012<\/h2>\n
2011<\/h2>\n
2010<\/h2>\n
2008<\/h2>\n
2007<\/h2>\n
2006<\/h2>\n
2004<\/h2>\n
2002-2003<\/h2>\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n